Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1189320230170020338
Asian Spine Journal
2023 Volume.17 No. 2 p.338 ~ p.346
The Use of High-Density Pedicle Screw Construct with Direct Vertebral Derotation of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Comparison of Two Surgical Strategies
Chang Sam-Yeol

Kim Jae-Hun
Mok Su-Jung
Chang Bong-Soon
Lee Choon-Ki
Kim Hyoung-Min
Abstract
Study Design: This study was a retrospective case series.

Purpose: This study was designed to determine whether direct vertebral rotation (DVR) of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) using a high-density (HD) construct can reduce fusion segments without increasing adverse outcomes in selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Overview of Literature: LIV DVR is used to maximize spontaneous lumbar curve correction and reduce adverse outcomes during STF for AIS. However, evidence is limited on whether LIV DVR can allow a proximally located LIV and reduce fusion segments without increasing adverse outcomes.

Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients with Lenke 1 AIS who underwent STF from 2000 to 2017. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical strategy used: low-density (LD) construct without DVR of the LIV (LD group) versus HD construct with DVR of the LIV (HD group). We collected data on the patient¡¯s demographic characteristics, skeletal maturity, operative data, and measured radiological parameters in the preoperative and final follow-up radiographs. The occurrence of adding-on (AO) and coronal decompensation was also determined.

Results: In this study, 72 patients (five males and 67 females) with a mean age of 14.1¡¾2.3 years were included. No significant differences in the demographics, skeletal maturity, and Lenke type distribution were observed between the two groups; however, the follow-up duration was significantly longer in the LD group (64.3¡¾25.7 months vs. 40.7¡¾22.2 months, p <0.001). The HD group had significantly shorter fusion segments (7.1¡¾1.3 vs. 8.5¡¾1.2, p <0.001) and a more proximal LIV level (12.1¡¾0.9 vs. 12.7¡¾1.0, p =0.009). In the radiological measurements, the improvement of LIV+1 rotation (Nash?Moe scale) was significantly larger in the HD group (0.53¡¾0.51 vs. 0.21¡¾0.41, p =0.008). AO and decompensation occurred in 7 (9.7%) and 4 (5.6%) patients in the HD and LD groups, respectively, without any significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: In this study, the HD group had a significantly shorter fusion level and a more proximal LIV than the LD group; however, the two groups had similar curve correction and adverse radiological outcome rates.
KEYWORD
Scoliosis, Spinal fusion, Instrumentation, Pedicle screws, Rotation
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
KoreaMed